Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: DII Nationals Bids announced

  1. #1

    DII Nationals Bids announced

    Division II

    California
    Chico State
    Cincinnati
    George Mason
    Grand Valley State
    Kennessaw State
    Metro State
    Missouri State
    Neumann
    Rowan
    SIU - Edwardsville
    Stephen F Austin
    SUNY - Brockport
    Tampa
    UC San Diego
    West Chester
    Alternate 1 - Missouri S&T
    Alternate 2 - Miami
    Alternate 3 - St. Louis (SLU)
    Alternate 4 - Temple

    The only team I dont understand getting a bid is Chico State. While I understand that the west coast does not have much of a presence on these boards I do not see how a confernce that does not look very strong gets 3 bids. IMO any of the 4 alternates are more deserving than a 8 loss chico state.

  2. #2

    Re: DII Nationals Bids announced

    Quote Originally Posted by BEEZERAL View Post
    Division II


    The only team I dont understand getting a bid is Chico State. While I understand that the west coast does not have much of a presence on these boards I do not see how a confernce that does not look very strong gets 3 bids. IMO any of the 4 alternates are more deserving than a 8 loss chico state.
    Just my .02 as a WCRHL observer, but the parity in the division definitely does not equal a division that isn't very strong. It's a common misconception that holds untrue in this case.

    The entire division was very close, and Chico (who is actually a 7 loss team, not 8) beat national bid Cal twice in the same regional tournament, in round robin and in the semifinal, 6-2 both games. They also had a 2-0 regular season record against UC San Diego, the other national bid.

    Chico went 5-1 in their last 6 regular season games and 3-1 in regionals, against pretty stiff competition.

    The bid is valid.

  3. #3

    Re: DII Nationals Bids announced

    Quote Originally Posted by WeakSauce View Post
    Just my .02 as a WCRHL observer, but the parity in the division definitely does not equal a division that isn't very strong. It's a common misconception that holds untrue in this case.

    The entire division was very close, and Chico (who is actually a 7 loss team, not 8) beat national bid Cal twice in the same regional tournament, in round robin and in the semifinal, 6-2 both games. They also had a 2-0 regular season record against UC San Diego, the other national bid.

    Chico went 5-1 in their last 6 regular season games and 3-1 in regionals, against pretty stiff competition.

    The bid is valid.
    Weak Sauce, how has the WCRHL done at nationals in the past few years?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    St Louis MO
    Posts
    103

    Re: DII Nationals Bids announced

    Sheesh!!

    C'mon!!

    Do you realize how this makes UM look?

    You know the US Supreme Court just might like to have you around. You cant stop comparing your team to everyone else and begging to get UM noticed for their good play. You didnt win the games you needed to when they really needed to be. Last years teams are different than this years, semesters are different for some teams.

    Yet you got an alternate bid.

    say Thank you and slowly walk away from the keyboard.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South St. Louis City
    Posts
    182

    Re: DII Nationals Bids announced

    D2 teams who feel snubbed by not receiving a bid:

    If you would've played D1, you'd have been no lower than a 4th alternate!

    LOL

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •