Congratulations, Rich!

[DannyG]

The new site looks good!

I'm old, it will take a while to get used to parts of it. I like the smilies...

See you out on the blue floor!

[GROWL]

I Completely agree. Nothing like a nice looking, easy to use website! Great job Burke!

[Alvare71]

I like the new add to reputation part

[RichardGraham]

Thanks, Danny.

It's going to take me a while to get used to the new Message Boards (or Forums), too. (Anheuser's Disease.)

[RichardGraham]

Hi Anthony,

I'm trying to figure out how to respond to posts below the initial one. I think I simply click on "quote" and go from there. I'll find out soon enough.

[RichardGraham]

Hi David,

Thanks. It's a work in progress, but it needed to be done. For one thing, IHC's Links section was being inundated with hundreds of spam submissions, and the administrative function only allowed me to delete them one at a time. There were also some dead functions on the old site, etc. This new design will take some getting used to, but I hope that everyone is pleased with it once we get everything where we want it.

Kudos to Mike Burke for the hard work he did on the redesign.

Sincerely,

Richard Graham
Editor
Inline Hockey Central

[MBurke]

Hi Anthony,

I'm trying to figure out how to respond to posts below the initial one. I think I simply click on "quote" and go from there. I'll find out soon enough.

All,

You can do a regular reply (sans quote) by scrollling to the very bottom of the page and looking on the left side.

[standsview]

Looks Great!!

[RichardGraham]

Hi Standsview,

Thanks for the kind words. Much appreciated!

[calihockey]

Good job on the site Burke! It was starting to look as old as Rich. No offense to the site

[RichardGraham]

Geez, Cali,

You're aging every year along with me, dude. Guess it DEPENDS on how you look at things, eh?

[MBurke]

Good job on the site Burke! It was starting to look as old as Rich.

I don't know if that's possible. I've seen pictures.

[calihockey]

Pictures don't do justice. I am not pointing fingers, but I think the editor had something to do with AARP putting limits on length of membership.