View Full Version : Nationals Team Predictions
Rebel48
02-11-2009, 12:07 AM
For sake of discussion, list your nationals team list for this year. Give your prediction on who you think will qualify for nationals. All divisions.
East:
1.Rutgers
2.Buffalo
3.Towson
4.Rhode Island.
5.Penn State
6.West Point
Great Plains:
1.Lindenwood
2.UMSL
3.Mizzou
Midwest:
1.Mich State
2.Ohio
3.Michigan
Rocky Mt:
1.Colo State
SouthEast:
1.UCF
2.UF
3.FIU
SouthWest:
1.ULL
2.UNT
West:
1.UC I
2.Long Beach
3.UC Santa B.
4.UNLV
5.ASU
6.Cal Poly SLO
hockeydude92
02-11-2009, 11:40 AM
East:
1.Rutgers
2.Buffalo
3.Towson
4.Rhode Island.
5.Penn State
6.West Point
Great Plains:
1.Lindenwood
2.UMSL
3.Mizzou
Midwest:
1.Mich State
2.Ohio
3.Michigan
Rocky Mt:
1.Colo State
SouthEast:
1.UCF
2.UF
3.FIU
SouthWest:
1.ULL
2.UNT
West:
1.UC I
2.Long Beach
3.UC Santa B.
4.UNLV
5.ASU
6.Cal Poly SLO
Everything looks copacetic until you look at the ECRHA.
The only way West Point will make nationals is if they win out the ECRHA Championship. So that would bump Stony Brook up instead of them for a bid, in the fact that SBU has 12 pts pending this weekend, and West Point has finished with 11 pts for the season.
Topshelf39
02-11-2009, 02:26 PM
Division 2
East:
1.Westchester
2.Neumann
3.Rowan
4.Brockport
5.Shippensburg
SouthEast:
1.FAU
2.UTampa
3.Western Carolina*
4.Elon*
Great Plains:
1.SIU Edwardsville
2.Truman State
3.Missouri St.
Midwest:
1.Central Michigan
2.Grand Valley St.
Rocky Mountain:
1.Metro State-Denver
West:
1.UC San Diego
2.California
rocksforhands
02-11-2009, 02:55 PM
D2 national bids:
East:
Rowan
Brockport
West Chester
Neumann
Shippensburg
Great Plains:
SIU-Edwardsville
Truman St
Midwest
Central Michigan
Grand Valley St.
Cincinnatti
Rocky Mountain:
Metro State-Denver
Southeast:
FAU
Tampa
West
UC San Diego
USC
SCIL:
University of Texas-Dallas
The east could get shorted one bid and it could go to any other conference just have to wait and see though
JLambertUMSL
02-11-2009, 03:39 PM
D2 national bids:
East:
Rowan
Brockport
West Chester
Neumann
Shippensburg
Great Plains:
SIU-Edwardsville
Truman St
Midwest
Central Michigan
Grand Valley St.
Cincinnatti
Rocky Mountain:
Metro State-Denver
Southeast:
FAU
Tampa
West
UC San Diego
USC
SCIL:
University of Texas-Dallas
The east could get shorted one bid and it could go to any other conference just have to wait and see though
You're missing Missouri State. They only have two losses this season, neither of which should count against them: http://www.ncrha.org/team.php?team_id=52653&area=schedule
They'll get a chance to prove themselves next weekend, when they play Tampa and Grand Valley. Should be interesting!
William Bourque
02-11-2009, 04:42 PM
TopShelf-
You have 17 teams and no teams from the SCHL?
Clever Name
02-11-2009, 05:10 PM
come on Rebel, you can't start a thread and not have your own input ha
BEEZERAL
02-11-2009, 05:16 PM
Division 2
East:
1.Westchester
2.Neumann
3.Rowan
4.Brockport
5.Shippensburg
SouthEast:
1.FAU
2.UTampa
3.Western Carolina*
4.Elon*
Great Plains:
1.SIU Edwardsville
2.Truman State
3.Missouri St.
Midwest:
1.Central Michigan
2.Grand Valley St.
Rocky Mountain:
1.Metro State-Denver
West:
1.UC San Diego
2.California
Miami played horribly against Elon when they tied. Miami would work Elon and Western Carolina. It makes no sense that the ECRHA has so many bids. THE SECRHL has arguably the best team in DII and has to play DI teams like FIU, UF, UCF, all of which will be in the hunt to meet Lindenwood in the Finals. The SECRHL deserves but wont get more than 2 bids.
William Bourque
02-11-2009, 05:45 PM
Arguably?
Neumann beat West Chester for the National Championship last season. Both teams are improved from last years squad.
They are with out doubt the #1 and #2 teams.
Brockport and Rowan have done well against those teams, with Rowan beating Neumann and tying West Chester, while Brockport beat Neumann and lost to West Chester by 2.
I would say without a doubt that the SE deserves two, but I can't see how you can argue that Miami would "work" Elon when they tied.
Also Western Carolina tied Millersville and Temple, the 9th and 15th best ECRHA teams. Although Temple could finished 11th or 12th.
dan sangiorgio
02-11-2009, 07:54 PM
i don't think you will see more southeast teams in d2 then great plains. both regions play against d1 teams and the southeast has always been under achievers in the d2 nationals i can't recall a final four team at any of the nationals i have been. i see the break down going like this
east-5(west chester,neumann,rowan,shipp,brockport)
greatplains-3 (SIU-ed,truman, mizz state)
midwest- 2 (grand valley, central mich)
southeast-2 (UT, FAU)
rocky-1(auto-bid)
southwest-1(autobid)
west-2 (UC san diego, regional runner up)
bubble teams/alternates-drexel,west carolina, SLU
i think if any region is likly to get less it might be the west getting only 1. I also think miami has no shot with out the autobid based on there record they might have a good SOS(which i don't really think it is) but with only 16 bids its hard to argue them over a team with only 2 or 3 losses
BEEZERAL
02-11-2009, 08:58 PM
I agree, I do not see Miami getting a bid unless they win regionals, but to say Miami did not play one of the tougher schedules in the country is very naive
Topshelf39
02-11-2009, 11:22 PM
ya i know that the stars was for 1 of those teams from the SE making it i completely forgot about the SCHL
Topshelf39
02-11-2009, 11:26 PM
i wouldnt say they played that tough of a schedule. atleast it isnt any tougher then say FAU or UT.
East
1. Rutgers
2. Buffalo
3. Rhode Island
4. Towson
5. Penn State
6. Stony Brook
Great Plains
1. Lindenwood
2. UMSL
3. Mizzou
Midwest
1. Michigan State
2. Ohio State
3. Michigan
Rocky Mountain
1. Colorado State
Southeast
1. Central Florida
2. Florida
3. Florida International
Southwest
1. North Texas
2. Louisiana Lafayette
West
1. UC Irvine
2. Long Beach State
3. UC Santa Barbara
4. UNLV
5. Arizona State
6. San Diego State
JLambertUMSL
02-12-2009, 02:52 PM
Midwest
1. Michigan State
2. Ohio State
3. Michigan
Eastern Michigan could win Regionals and get the auto-bid since they'll have Pat Lee and John Schultz. They're only a game away from being eligible. Looks like Popescu isn't going to make it though. One game on a roster, three games to go before Regionals (unless they get exhibition games added to their schedule).
If they have all of those guys, they've got the top-end talent to hang with anyone.
GSJaguars11
02-12-2009, 03:14 PM
I agree, I do not see Miami getting a bid unless they win regionals, but to say Miami did not play one of the tougher schedules in the country is very naive
I would say that the Ecrha teams play the hardest schedules
socalhockey
02-12-2009, 03:26 PM
The D1 teams in the WCRHL play by far the toughest schedules in by far the toughest conference in College hockey from top to bottom.
William Bourque
02-12-2009, 03:27 PM
I think he was talking in DII play, since he quoted the statement about Miami playing the hardest schedule.
warwick
02-12-2009, 07:11 PM
I think he was talking in DII play, since he quoted the statement about Miami playing the hardest schedule.
Arguably?
Neumann beat West Chester for the National Championship last season. Both teams are improved from last years squad.
They are with out doubt the #1 and #2 teams.
Brockport and Rowan have done well against those teams, with Rowan beating Neumann and tying West Chester, while Brockport beat Neumann and lost to West Chester by 2.
I would say without a doubt that the SE deserves two, but I can't see how you can argue that Miami would "work" Elon when they tied.
Also Western Carolina tied Millersville and Temple, the 9th and 15th best ECRHA teams. Although Temple could finished 11th or 12th.
bill,
i have to disagree with you. there is no way that this years neumann team is an improvement over last years. go back to the rosters and see what they lost and what they picked up and tell meif you still think so.
William Bourque
02-12-2009, 07:56 PM
I completely agree that what they lost is more they they gained, but the team that we played in Mount Pleasant was better than the team we played twice last season. And our team is much more improved than last year, even though we have the same players.
Eastern Michigan could win Regionals and get the auto-bid since they'll have Pat Lee and John Schultz. They're only a game away from being eligible. Looks like Popescu isn't going to make it though. One game on a roster, three games to go before Regionals (unless they get exhibition games added to their schedule).
If they have all of those guys, they've got the top-end talent to hang with anyone.
Yeah, I was assuming they didn't have Lee since he's not on their roster anymore.
hockeymonkey44
02-12-2009, 11:12 PM
What makes every one think Metro State-Denver is the automatic bid in the Rocky Mountains?
Division 2
East:
1.Westchester
2.Neumann
3.Rowan
4.Brockport
5.Shippensburg
SouthEast:
1.FAU
2.UTampa
3.Western Carolina*
4.Elon*
Great Plains:
1.SIU Edwardsville
2.Truman State
3.Missouri St.
Midwest:
1.Central Michigan
2.Grand Valley St.
Rocky Mountain:
1.Metro State-Denver
West:
1.UC San Diego
2.California
Topshelf39
02-13-2009, 10:13 AM
I dont have any idea how the teams are in the Rocky Mountain so the reason why i chose metro state is based on there record, plus they are 1-0-1 verse the second place team and 1-1-0 verse the 3rd place team. thats why i have them winning regionals.
Rebel48
02-13-2009, 11:31 PM
Touche CleverName.
ECRHA:
Rutgers
Buffalo
Towson
Rhode Island
Penn St.
Stony Brook
GPICHL:
Lindenwood
UMSL
Mizzou
MCRHL:
Mich. St
OSU
Michigan
RMCRHA:
CSU
SCRHL:
Central Florida
Florida
FIU
SCHL:
UNT
ULL
WCRHL:
UC Santa Barbara
Long Beach
UCI
UNLV
SDSU
ASU
keepPracticeing
02-14-2009, 01:43 AM
to stop this talk about pat lee and eastern michigan i spoke to him today and he confirmed that he is not playing for them....
Topshelf39
02-14-2009, 03:59 PM
Im going to go against what i had posted earlier abt the SE region. Bc of this weekend and the results that have occurred i think the bids will now be FAU UT and Kennesaw St.
AJ Barnett
02-16-2009, 12:05 AM
Division I
ECRHA
Rutgers
Buffalo
Rhode Island
Towson
Stony Brook
Penn. State
GPICHL
Lindenwood
UMSL
Mizzou
MCRHL
Mich. St
Ohio St.
Michigan
RMCRHA
Colorado St.
SCRHL
Central Florida
Florida
North Carolina St.
SCHL
Louisiana St.
Louisiana Lafayette
WCRHL
UC Santa Barbara
UC-Irvine
Long Beach
San Diego St.
Arizona St
UNLV
William Bourque
02-16-2009, 12:14 AM
Forget a team?
AJ Barnett
02-16-2009, 12:54 AM
Forget a team?
Mistake corrected.
jscotto
02-16-2009, 12:15 PM
I completely agree that what they lost is more they they gained, but the team that we played in Mount Pleasant was better than the team we played twice last season. And our team is much more improved than last year, even though we have the same players.
Bill...I think what you saw this year was a change in coaching philosophy... we could have easily "run up" scores last year. The focus was more on team defense, getting a "comfortable" lead and rotating players by running 3 and 4 lines. We also sat our "big guns" when the scores started to get out of hand. Our focus last year was to win Nationals, being that we let it slip away the year before with a poor defensive showing in Regionals as well as in St. Louis. Defense will always win the big games for you not running and gunning, especially at Nationals when you play teams that you know nothing about...just what is on paper.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.